Monday, October 31, 2005

"The very same."

It's often difficult to know when drawing a parrallel is appropriate and when it is not; when two things truly match, and when they have but superficial similarities. Here is an example from the Corner:

ANGER DIDN'T GO OUT WITH THE WEEKEND [Kathryn Jean Lopez]
An e-mail re: Kossack "Assilito":
No different than the scorn, contempt and mockery this website leveled at H. Miers. The very same.

The fact that DailyKos took no time at all to come up with a bitter and unfunny jibe on the name of Bush's new Supreme Court nominee is unsurprising. They are singlarly talented at such. The suggestion that the principled wariness towards Miers on the part of the Cornerites and others of the right-blogosphere is no different from "Assilito" is, however, a bit surprising.

I'm well aware that there could be a line of reasoning to support this: the Kos attacks Alito, the Corner attacked Miers. So the latter used subordinate clauses and I-despair-for-conservatism routines and the former used four-letter words, what's the diff? Least the Kossacks are honest and don't pretend they're nice; they see a mark, they take it down. For some, that's a lot more bracing than what some might consider Andy McCarthy's maudlin attempt to mend fences.

It's there, but it's un-persuasive. There is a difference between being able to lay out your objections to someone serving on the High Court and the reflexive name-calling war-drum-beating that takes place on much of the web. This isn't a left-wing/right-wing divide, either. I'm sure plenty of right-wing sites descended to pitiful mockery of Miers, and even on the Corner there's a cry-havoc tone about the posts this morning.

This is meant more as a lament about the huge number of people incapable of making distinctions about important issues. We see it in the way people can't tell the difference between a scientific theory and cosmology; or in the difference between Vietnam and Iraq. At times like these, I hear and respect the complaints made about our culture's brash lines and loud callings. No room for saying no-it-isn't-this-but-this when we want to find the flags, ingest the talking points, and engage the enemy.

I suppose it must be so. It is an age of war.

Madonna: the Gag That Keeps On Giving

We were hoping that Her Pretentiousness would grace us with a response to those who've been mocking her these past several weeks. Well the God she worships evidently exists, because our prayers have been answered. A few excerpts:

[S]he says her motivation for recording such an album wasn't simply to make fun music again, or even to shore up her wobbly recording career.

Instead, it seems, she wanted to, ahem, help mankind.

"It's that old cliché," Madonna explains, "when the world gets you down, you need to be lifted up. Look at the state of the world. People need to be inspired and happy."

The justification for all sappy music and bad TV, delivered with the pomposity of an adjunct professor of sociology. It just doesn't get any better than this.


Back then, the singer made a very un-Madonna-like move by withdrawing her controversial video for "American Life," which equated Bush with Saddam Hussein. Now she asserts that the only reason she yanked the video was "because I was worried for my children. I saw what happened with the Dixie Chicks. I didn't want people to throw rocks at [my kids] on the way to school."

Maybe I've been drinking the wrong Kool-Aid, but I don't remember anyone stoning the Dixie Chicks, and I've been waiting for someone to stone the Dixie Chicks for some time, because of their wack middlebrow countrified pop, not their politics. I'm pretty sure that all the Dixie Chicks had to put up with was some fan backlash. Anyone want to set me straight?


The new documentary contrasts tellingly with the old one. In "Truth or Dare," Madonna comes off as a flip and provocative fun-time gal. This time she says things like, "Sometimes fun is overrated."

While "Truth" painted her as an outrageous Lady Madonna, "Secret" reveals her to be a cross between Joan Baez and a singing-dancing Mother Teresa in training.

Sometimes fun is overrated, she says. Not rebellion. Not naughtiness. FUN.

Methinks the commenter on Boxing Alcibiades was correct when he suggested that Madonna was going to be a Catholic again in a few years. And hardcore, at that.


"Obviously, my tastes and my priorities have changed," she says. "But I am still asking the question 'Why?' Just because I'm a mother doesn't mean I'm not still a rebel...

Actually, Kato, that's exactly what it means. Rebellion is, or ought to be, dangerous work. If unsuccessful, it invites suppression by the Man, and if successful, leads to a vacuum of power that often kills its parents (just ask Danton). Those who have no one to leave behind are best suited to engaging in such. Those with children ought to have pause about the larger consequences of their actions. It's called responsibility.

Of course, this assumes a world where earning the title of "rebel" involves something a bit more risky than performing the epater le bourgeois routine for cash. So maybe she's right.


"It's not conservative," she says. "It's actually very punk-rock to not watch TV."

Because when I think "punk rock", I think "Madonna". Only in her world would being the movie girlfriend of Richard Hell make one an authority on music whose clothes she copied but never played. If the Bee Gees tried to tell us what was punk rock, we'd crucify them, but this silly disco granny gets taken seriously. As the Kabbalists say, OY.


But let Madonna talk long enough about pop-culture excess, and she ends up sounding not wildly dissimilar to Pat Robertson. "It's very surface-oriented and of the moment and disposable," she says. "You have to constantly up the ante. [Celebrities] just have to keep getting more extreme to get attention. It's crap. It's scary. We are obviously creating our own demise."

Eeyow! Are things that bad?

"Look at the world we live in," says Madonna, yet again.


Uh-huh. And she contributed to NONE of this. The woman who made bland, chirpy pop tunes that you could dance to about heartbreak and....more heartbreak; the woman who made a cottage industry out of offering substanceless shock disguised as deep thinking; the woman who famously made out with two of her copycats on national television is completely and utterly innocent of adding to a culture that is "surface-oriented and of the moment and disposable." Is there no one around her with an irony meter?

Where's that Belgian pie-thrower when you need him?


In reaction to this excess, the singer has spent more and more time exploring the inner life through her faith. The shift has inspired more hostility toward her than anything in years.

"It would be less controversial if I joined the Nazi Party," Madonna says of the kabbala.

Um, no. If Madonna joined the Nazi Pary, every American of conscience would denounce her from the highest soapbox, her career would swirl the drain with the rapidity of an American Idol winner, and we'd pack her off to England with hardly a memory. Joining Kabbalah has made her merely eccentric and subject to some of Leno and Letterman's lamer jokes.

Is there no one around her who's heard of Godwin's Law?


A song on the new album titled "Isaac," which uses Jewish musical motifs, has outraged some kabbalist rabbis. They claim the song is about Isaac (or Yitzhak) Luria, a 16th-century Jewish mystic. "Jewish law forbids the use of the name of the holy rabbi for profit," Rabbi Rafael Cohen, who heads a seminary named after Luria, said in a statement.

Madonna insists that her song is not about Luria at all but about Yitzhak Sinwani, who sings on the track. "They're saying I'm committing a blasphemy, but that's not what the song is about," she says. "What are they doing commenting on pop songs? Don't they have synagogues to pray in?"

So Madonna, Holy Madonna, Madonna our Redemptorix can mix the world of religion and pop and scoff at those who haven't the imagination to follow her, but anyone else with a different perspective should stay in the temple and shut up. I feel enlightened just being in her presence.

F. Scott Fitzgerald famously pithed that American Lives have no second acts. Madonna clearly doesn't believe this, which may be why she moved to England. But you can't have a second act until you pull the curtain down on the first one, which she is completely unwilling to do. And the longer she fails to do it, the more her fate as an entre'act spectacle, slipping in on the gag reel, is assured. And for someone like me, whose hated the woman since I first had to listen to shrill renderings of "Papa Don't Preach" by neighborhood girls, that will be a joy eternal.

Friday, October 28, 2005

Greatest Songs #13

Sonic Youth - "'Cross the Breeze" (1988, from Daydream Nation)


Sonic Youth is self-consciously art-rock, and usually the first band that my generation thinks of when the term is mentioned. So it's natural that something off of one of their albums would make the cut on my list. But why this one? If avoiding the obvious demands that I eschew "Teen Age Riot" for one of the deeper tracks from Daydream Nation, why not something more difficult to absorb, like "Candle" or "Rain King"? Hell, why not go all the way and nominate the album-closing "Wonder/Hyperstation/Eliminator Jr." trilogy?

Simple. The Riff. Good enough?

I thought not.

In order to have art-rock work, it's got to balance both. Too much art, and the song spins its wheels trying to get where it's going. Too much rock, and it's pretentious. What you need is a noise that fits your inarticulate desire, your overarching telos "'Cross the Breeze" is that song for this album.

Daydream Nation is an attack, a jujitsu flip over the back of the mannered pop tedium of the 80's, reaching for something grand, sprawling, infinite, a Grand Tomorrow for Music and Culture. Yes, the further away from music it gets, the sillier and more irritating it becomes, but that's just more to the point that musicians should stick to what they're good at.

So: what track is the most running, screaming, explosive? Duh. Just listen to Kim Gordon bellow "I Wanna Know!" at every chorus. That's not just asking for the answer to her questions, she wants to "know" in the ancient sense of the word, to feel and sense and see from the inside out, to grok in fullness, as the Man from Mars would put it. And the way the tune's basic structure is approached over the course of the song's seven minutes, from every concievable tempo and distortion-level, you have the match to this metaphysical quest for fire.

Plus, the riff is awesome. Seriously. It's like Dick Dale on steroids.


#14

The Battle Against Sexism Continues...

Samantha Burns has this little post as to why women are happier than men. It's obviously all meant in good fun, and only a churl would take offense at it. Only a bore would take it as an invitation to rejoinder and Fisk the thing.

Well, get your sleep masks, cause I'm gonna bore you. It's all meant with love, Sam:


1. the kitchen's all ours

You're welcome to it.

2. we get control of the wedding plans and we get to look the best at our wedding

Which means you get all the stress of picking flowers, picking dresses, picking DJ's, arguing with both mothers, deciding on a flavor for the top layer of the cake, deciding whether Uncle Jeff-Bob should be seated next to Cousin Marguerite, etc.

I get to show up on the day with my tux. Again, if this is your idea of victory, I surrender.

3. chocolate makes up for orgasms that men rarely give us

regular orgasms, chocolate; regular orgasms, chocolate...oooh, is this a toughie.

4. reading men is like reading an open book, whereas men can never understand women

If we're so easy to read, why do you feel the need to ask us so many questions?

5. we can get into a popular bar much easier than men; we just show some cleavage

You have me here. Long have I ached to stand in line several times a night to pay $6 for a bottle of Yuengling.

6. we don't fart, we fluff

Okay, your fluffs smell.

7. we know how to colour coordinate

Woman, please. This is the 21st century. We can all match our browns and our blues. Guys that you see going around un-spiffed-up are in their lounging-about clothes. And from the sights of some women who continually squeeze themselves into too-small garments, pseudo-poding around in spandex shorts with "Juicy" written on the butt and flip-flops, I don't think y'all's edge in this area is as vast as you think it is.

8. we can build a man's ego just by asking him to open a jar

Again, how are we the losers here?

9. we get doors opened for us

Round my parts, everybody opens doors for everybody else. I open doors, and I get doors opened. It's a brave new world.

10. we're not as hairy and we don't have to shave our faces

Nope, just legs and bikini zone. I'll take the face, thanks. And I think we all know that just because you don't shave your face, doesn't mean there's nothing there...

11. we aren't too chicken to ask for directions

Frankly, asking for directions is overrated. Sometimes, when you're completely turned around, it's of value, but in most of my experience the people you stop to and ask have no idea a) how to get to your destination, and b) how to pronounce your destination, because they can't speak English. This hardly constitutes help.

12. scratching ourselves is not an hourly event in our lives

Your loss, babe.

13. we can do two things at once: comprehend what someone tells us while we're watching tv, or pack a baby on our hips with a toddler holding our other hand and push a shopping cart while checking our grocery list and getting the cheapest, best products off the shelf.

I'm going to divide these, for easy conquest, into three parts:
1) You may be able to comprehend what's being said, but the end result is a series of annoying questions about the TV show/movie directed at those of us who prefer to do one thing at a time ("What's happening?" "Whose that?" "Hey, isn't that the guy from that movie that we saw that one time?")
2) Okay, okay. That is handy.
3) See response to "color co-ordination" above, substituting "read a price," for "match browns and blues,". Guys that you see wandering around like stunned children at the supermarket are there with their wives, who always ask their hubs for input and then ignore it. Eventually we learn to daydream about the aspects of our lives we actually have some power to make decisions about, and wait until its over.


Wow...that was...cathartic...

Victory is Mine!

I was right. It's Madonna.

What Samantha failed to point out was how much her music sucks. Someone appropriately grumpy and snobby should attempt such. Oh, sure, *I* could do it, but where's the fun for you?

The Business of the Internet is Business

Greatest Song #14 will be up late this afternoon, early this evening. In the meantime, ponder the circomlocutions of the Internet by considering this.

If anybody was an MST3K fan, I was, and if anyone was bereft when the show finally breathed its last, that person would again be me. So it was exciting, back in 2000, to check out Mike Nelson's follow-up project, the Web site Timmy Big Hands.

Folks, timing is everything. If Timmy Big Hands was starting up now, it would be a massive hit and probably a money-maker for Nelson. But five years ago, even Glenn Reynolds was hardly a household name, and the monetary structure that allows people to rake in cash off hit counts was woefully underdeveloped. Back then, the Internet was a handy place to buy stuff but otherwise an abyss of free wackery. Fun, sure...but difficult for individuals to sustain.

Things are, ahem, different now.

Thursday, October 27, 2005

The Far Right is Out of Control!

So scream a variety of commenters at Captain's Quarters, and emailers at the Corner, and doubtless other sites as well. The last time we all heard this was during the Schiavo case, and I found it equally hysterical then.

Folks nobody turned on Harriet Miers because Jesus told them that Miers was the Anti-Christ. There was a good deal of concern that she'd be another O'Connor, turning over rights in the Constitution that no one else could find there. That's why the right wanted, and wants, someone with judicial experience and a set idea of how the Constitution works.

Call it a philosophical impasse: we rabid reactionaries don't believe in a "living constitution," because to us it's shorthand for "constitution that says whatever the hell we feel like making it say." We like a "dead constitution" that says what it says and doesn't say anything else. Then, if we don't like what it says, we can change it to what we want it to say, just as soon as we persuade everyone that it should say that. We consider this approach the more democratic one.


UPDATE: Boxing Alcibiades does the math:
With roughly a third of the active electorate in their party, the Republicans have to obtain only 18% of the "moderate" votes in order to get to 51%. In other words, it is possible for the Republicans to win (again, we're dealing with abstracts here, so this will vary by office), while losing the majority of the moderate vote.

Read the whole thing.

And...She's Gone

The collapse of the Miers nomination leads me to put another notch on the blogosphere's belt. Right-sphere sites, especially the Corner, were against this nomination from the beginning, and gradually the "meh" factor overwhelmed her, despite having a degree of bona fides in abortion and as an evangelical. It helps that conservative columnists such as George Will also pointed their thumbs down, but I think its fair to say that the right-sphere makes up a significant, or at least significantly vocal, portion of the Republican base, and they made their voices heard. At any rate, the Prez now has a chance to ameliorate that base.

Pluse, Bush Backs Budget Cuts! This keeps up, people are gonna start accusing him of being a Republican...

Good Morning.

I don't know how much blogging I'm going to manage today. I think the next Greatest Song is going to have to wait until tommorrow. Today I'm just overladen with work.

Wednesday, October 26, 2005

Journeymen Journalists?

Jonah Goldberg on the stupidity of federal shield laws and the decay of the First Amendment.

Guilds are only a good thing in a feudal society, where the represent protection of tradesmen against a grasping nobility. In a modern free-market society, they represent a barrier to the citizenry and protection for those who are closest to the corridors of power. No one can argue that "freedom of the press" means any such thing.

Plame: the Mega-MEGO

I gotta tell ya, everytime I even try to figure out what the hell's going on in this case, my brain starts aching. I can't even labor to care about who knew what and who said what to who and when they said it. It's hilarious that the Democrats have made the CIA their victim in their attempt to reconstruct Watergate.

That being said, I hardly think that leaking the identities of intelligence agents to the media is something we should be permitting. But we're getting dangerously close to the press' bread-and-butter here. Is it really the position of the New York Times that public officials who leak information to reporters should be punished? Are they so desperate to get Bush that they'll side with the ghost of Richard Nixon to do it?

But, like everyone else, I'm awaiting events. Got a sneaking suspicion that Libby's the one that gets indicted, though.


UPDATE: I am so Smart! I am so Smart! S-M-R-T!

More Ace of Spades:

Appeasement, appeasement, appeasement. It's what the left offers. It's all it offers. If we would only make ourselves more amenable to those who would murder us, maybe they'll stop being so angry.

Do any lefty speakers at Vagina Day rallies ever suggest that a battered woman ought to just "try to be nicer" the man smacking him around, maybe put out a little more, maybe make dinner a little tastier, in order to defuse his wrath?


Now I know that not everybody on the Left thinks that the only way to defeat terrorism is for us to stop being so pushy, but plenty consider it at least an essential component. What the other components are, they haven't been in too much of a rush to say.

Well, Imagine that...

Ace of Spades takes a bite out of the State Department, which can never have too many, as far as I'm concerned:

[H]e complains that the foreign policy power was taken out of the hands of career State Department bureaucrats, where the Constitution entrusts it, and reposed unconstitutionally in the hands of a mere "President" and "Vice President."

Nothing new here. Like all capitols, Washington has long been a seat of entrenched power, as sure as if the place was full of dukes and earls. And these Trained Professionals do not care to take orders from the merely popular amateurs in whom authority and responsibility are vested. I suppose that it will always be thus, but now and again one feels the need to cleanse the temple.

Blech.

I had to delete the previous post because it was taking up too much bandwidth and throwing off the look of the place. Aesthetics demanded a crushing defeat.

But I am Julius Caeser.

Tuesday, October 25, 2005

Greatest Songs #14

Minor Threat - "Cashing In" (1983, from Out of Step)

No one becomes a Rocker without accepting its limitations: three-chords, three-minutes, usually about sex or the lack thereof. Perversely, though, almost everyone who becomes a Punk rocker thinks that they've stumbled over the Rosetta Stone, a way to make pure aggressive music that's about something. And, to a degree they're right. Sometimes I like to annoy the more preachy spike-heads by comparing Punk to Christianity: no matter how many times it's declared dead, the sumbitch never manages to belly-up. But that persistence is the result of a stylish musical perversity: deliberately making songs that are un-lovely, raw to the point of amateurishness, fit only for a declaration of ephemeral rage that only adolescents, with their complete lack of self-awareness, are capable of.

Added to that is the fact that Punk lost it's spiritual purity, whatever that might have been, some time ago. People like to fling feces at Hot Topic for commodifying the genre's image and ersatz rebellion, but frankly, that's all poppycock. Yes, someone who walked into a Hot Topic one day a straight-laced jock and walked out a harDCore Goth Punk would be a doofus, and deserving of every slur that could be marshalled against them. But almost nobody does that. Plus, 90% of the music sold there is stuff you can't find at the Sam Goody at the other end of the mall, all on indie labels and unavailable otherwise to the market they serve. And where else in the suburbs am I supposed to find Misfits records on vinyl?

Besides, Hot Topic is but a descendant of commerical enterprises that have been selling Punk style from the masses since the beginning: from Commander Salamander to Malcom McClaren's Sex, there have always been stores offering instant punk uniforms. Nor were they ashamed about it: shifting the culture was the whole point. The Clash didn't form their own record label and sell their stuff out of the back of the tour van; they signed to CBS Records in 1976 for £100,000. This DIY-purity, we-hate-every-band-that-more-that-50-people-know-about routine didn't come until the early-to-mid 80's, after British Punk had imploded and American Punk utterly failed to make it on the radio.

A lot of people like to edit that out of their thinking, and in most cases that leads to a lot of treacly diatribes as a part of a lot of formulaic songs by a lot of punk-by-numbers bands. But occasionally a band will dismount its high horse and take a righteous slash at its own self-righteousness, and so did Minor Threat, by all accounts one of the preachiest bands of a preachy genre, do in '82 with "Cashing In."

First off, the song starts with a bouncy, almost hilarious bass line that indicates a departure from the wholesale ranting that's come before. Ian "My Coolness Weighs Upon Me Like An Albatross" MacKaye starts mock-laughing, and we could be sure he'd be pulling his moustache if he hadn't had all hair as completely removed from his body as an Egyptian priest. And then the swirling guitars come in, and our song is complete: awaiting only the words of Ian the Great, Gatekeeper to Henry Rollins' Scenemaster (enjoy that image for a moment before pressing on):

How do you do?
I don't think that we've met
My name is Ian,
I'm in Minor Threat

Yes, it's a first person song, which means SARCASM writ as large as a movie promo. But it's a first person song about himself, which means MacKaye is being sarcastic about himself and his work, which is a damn fine thing for any rock or pop star to be doing, and for which he should be commended. After a somewhat garbled line about "making money out of every set," we have the chorus:

We don't care
We don't pose
We'll steal your money
We'll steal your show

This last is song by what appears to be the whole band, or at any rate, multiple voices, giving the impression of mass input. No more is merely the Magnificent Ian to be subject to the acid disdain of a harDCore song, nor even merely the band Minor Threat, but the whole harDCore scene, and, by implication, the whole punk movement, promising solidarity but still competing for the necessities of their careers.

Now if the song went thusly for a few turns and then stomped on the brakes, it would already be one of the better tracks in Minor Threat's catalogue, but it doesn't do that. Instead, the song dramatically shifts, in tempo and style, into an elongated outro, and in function from a satire to a requiem:

There's no place like home
There's no place like home
There's no place like home
So where am I?

This repeats, with slightly different emphasis on different syllables each time, until the instruments climax and drain away, and Ian actually sings the last line, actually uses his voicebox as a mutual intrument instead of a megaphone, and the self and the band and the scene and the movement fade away, the Jeremiad that this song has been dead with them, leaving only a desolate wasteland, fit for Lamentations.

Naturally, Minor Threat were done after this. Saint Ian of the Community Center does not tarry with things that he deems impure. But for a brief shining moment before running with the eternal experiment Fugazi, His Punkness actually destroyed his adolescence so that he could grow into something else, and missed it as it went. That's more up-front honesty than any pop song has dared in a long time.


#15

Uh-Huh...


My blog is worth $1,693.62.
How much is your blog worth?



Somehow, I don't think I'll be seeing that money anytime soon.

The Establishment, Man...

...hasn't gone away. It's as real as it was in the 50's. It still to be found in the seats of power. They may have changed their clothes, and a few of their opinions, but they haven't disappeared. Mark Steyn provides the evidence, in this rerun of a Kay Graham obit. The babble surrouding this woman's death in the D.C. area was nothing short of maudlin, and a most refreshing tonic this is.

Ever Seen Snatch?

You know the scene where Georgeous George talks a lot of smack at Mickey, kicks him a few times, tells him to stay down, etc., only to have Mickey break his neck with one punch?

Behold. Life imitates art.


UPDATE: The London Times and Sisu have more.

Now I'm thinking of Oliver Stone's Nixon: "It's the lie that gets you."

All the King's Bluster

The logical steps of a Saddam Trial.

Monday, October 24, 2005

At Least He Didn't Have to Wait as Long as the Ice Man

Politburo Diktat tells of a WW2 airman, crashed in the Sierras in 1942, that has been found and ID'ed. The last statement, though is the killer:

Military officials said there are 88,000 Americans still missing from past wars, most of them, 78,000, from World War II.

78,000 missing soldiers. Thirty-nine times our current casualties. Gone. Not even with a headstone for a marker and a letter home to the folks. Disappeared, as though the earth had swallowed them up.

It boggles the mind.

For Other Cranky Right-Wing Bastards...

Try to guess Samantha Burns Moron of the Week. I went with Madonna, but it's an open field.

The Little Killers

So far the mystery of who killed one of the lawyers on Saddam's defense team is up for grabs, as far as Ken Frost is concerned. According to him "Hussein opponents, Sunni insurgents or Hussein supporters are all possibilities."

I dunno if I blame the insurgency for this one. If it is them, they're dumber than I even believed possible. You don't kill the defense lawyers of someone you don't want to see tried, you kill the prosecutors, and defy the man to do anything about it. Ask any good Columbian drug lord.

And like a good Columbian drug lord, I suspect Hussein's lawyer may have run afoul of a different kind of insurgent. You can call them the Iraqi Los Pepes, and they may or may not be wacking insurgents on behalf of the Iraqi government. I don't know if I hope these people exist or not (probably not), but if they do, I hope it wasn't them that took out Hussein's lawyer. I hope whoever it was is quickly caught, and quickly punished. He's as big a danger as Zarqawi ever was.

The Population Bomb, redux

Boxing Alcibiades links to a .pdf about whose populations are expected to grow in the next century.

Then follow my link to an article about the real Population Bomb.

Long Weekend.

I was out of town. Bloggins will resume in a couple of hours, after I get my last class out of the way.

Friday, October 21, 2005

Greatest Songs #15

The White Stripes - "Ball and Biscuit" (2003, from Elephant)


"'Natch," think anybody who reads this and knows me personally. I've made no bones about being a big Stripes fan, ever since I got White Blood Cells. I liked them at the time because they were Rock and they were sharp, and they had good gimmicks (boy/girl, no bass, etc.). I started to love them after Elephant, a slab of gutbucket Rock n'Roll that was much more focused than White Blood Cells, which wandered in the second half. I had to laugh at the poor denuded bastards who bought the album on the basis of "Seven Nation Army" the dance-club single, only find themselves awash in feedback and other bluesman blowtorchery. Caveat Emptor, ya dinks. It ain't like it's hard to find out what a band sounds like before you plunk cash down.

But back to that bluesman blowtorchery. "Ball and Biscuit," has long been my favorite song from a) this album, b) this band, c) the whole rock revival of the early 00's. It's not hard to understand why. It's Jack White giving carte blanch to his lust for guitar wankery, 5 minutes of pure distorted sonic clash. Does the riff and chorus repeat? A little. Does it demonstrate a whole lotta imagination? Not too much, no. Do I care? Nah.

The Stripes are a glorious example of rock primitivism, not of the Rousseauist noble-savage free-your-mind school of someone like the Fugs, but true primitivism, that seeks art in the dirt of the land, for its own sake. How else would you explain the opening lyrics?

It's quite possible that I'm your third man, girl
But it's a fact that I'm the seventh son

Coming from Julian Casablancas, or even Howlin' Pelle Almqvist, this would be at best inconspicuous and at worst risible. Coming from the guy who sang "I can tell that we are gonna be friends," it's attention-getting, hearkening back to folk myths and the Bible (King David was a seventh son), a statement of power.

If you understand that, then you understand that Get Behind Me Satan isn't a departure, it's a logical progression of their sound, bringing in marimbas and mandolins and sweet chimes to explore the other connections of folk and rock and blues music. Jack and Meg will never have the polish of an REM, nor will they be burdened with the same secondhand Voice-of-a-Generation status. While the Stripes are working a similar heartland-rock melieu, everyone understands that they speak for no one but themselves. Frankly, that's refreshing to see.


#16

The Irony of Being Unaware of Your Irony While Accusing Someone of Doing the Same.

I appreciate that dredging DailyKos for yucks is rather passe, but sometimes I have to wonder. In today's "Cheers and Jeers" for example, one finds this:

Coulter, that hard-line conservative, told Geraldo Rivera in 2000 that it was perfectly okay to sleep around: "Let's say I go out every night, I meet a guy and have sex with him. Good for me. I'm not married." But then God came knocking to remind her that, along with homosexuality, sleeping around before marriage is a no-no, so she told the London Telegraph:

"I will never say publicly that, as a Christian, I think God says it's okay to have premarital sex or to have homosexual sex." Oops. Well, you already did, Ann. ... Stumbling along the talk-show circuit like a badly drawn cartoon, she seems completely unaware of her own irony.


Okay. I'm gonna read that statement a couple more times, and see if I can find the point where Coulter says pre-marital sex is okay....

Nope, not seeing it.

I realize that there may be a few structuralists among the Kossacks, but generally speaking, someone who uses the words "Let's say," is intending that what follows is regarded as a hypothetical situation. And to someone well-versed in the rythmns of speech on American political television, the words "Good for me," are almost never read literally. They're intended as, well...irony.

I feel the need to offer a definition of irony, but I'm too distracted by wondering how tin-eared you need to be to not read context into a statement of this kind. Of course, it occurs to me that the whole post may be of the wink-wink variety, or that Bill from Portland, Maine may be offering this as a jeer at the writer as much as at Coulter. But when the gag above is about the flatulence of Gerald Ford and the gag below regurgitates Richard Clarke, then...I just don't know.

Thursday, October 20, 2005

Saddam's Trial Round-Up

Here's Wretchard, going back to Nuremberg.

Here's Austin Bay, agreeing with me that dispatch is of the essence.


I'll update this as the day progresses.


UPDATE: Working for Change goes through the "Why didn't we stop him then?" routine. A fair question, and one which can be chalked up to the "He's a sonofabitch, but he's our sonofabitch" Great-Game international-chess-board. Not our proudest moment, and saying that we had other fish to fry at the time is hardly an answer. But what to draw from this, other than the Saddams and Mugabe's must not be tolerated any longer, must indeed be regarded as the enemy?


And the University of Chicago Faculty Law Blog draws a fascinating parallel.


AND FURTHERMORE: George Will, from the day of Saddam's capture. He was wrong about Saddam being "bravely defiant," but he reminds us, in his discussion of the position of the then-Democratic candidates, of the fact that getting rid of the wicked sometimes involves dirtying our hands.


COULDN'T RESIST: Lileks plays the Clinton Hypocrisy card:

I don’t mean to start out the day with a polarizing note, but: do you think that if President Clinton had invaded Iraq and knocked Saddam for power in 1998, we’d be seeing a movie about the dictator’s trial right now, with George Clooney as the prosecutor?

The promised Screedblog is good, too, though not about Saddam.


ET CETERA: Deseret News says that history will be kind to the trial.
John Kunich, an international law specialist at Appalachian College of Law in Grundy, Va., says Saddam's trial has the potential to have an impact similar to last January's vote for an interim Iraqi government.
"This could be another 'purple finger moment,' " Kunich says, referring to the dyed fingers identifying voters that Iraqis displayed as proud symbols of their democracy. "This is really a first in the Arab world, a former leader being called to account for his crimes, in the dock like an ordinary criminal. There's no telling how potent that will be.


And here's a go-to source: The Trial of Saddam Hussein on Blogspot. To the blogroll!


HA!:
"I prefer the trial goes like this:
Q:Are you Saddam Hussein?
A:Yes.
Then take this bullet in the head."

Not that I'm advocating such an approach, mind you, even as poetic justice. But it has a certain economy. And yes, I know economy in a capitol trial is not a good thing.

Wednesday, October 19, 2005

Someone at DailyKos Thinks Saddam Hussein is Right

I think. Or he might not. Frankly, if you can parse this, you're smarter than I am.

Best. Chomsky Takedown. Ever.

Peter Schweizer of TechCentralStation absolutely nails the old fraud. Diary of an Anti-Chomskyite hasn't even noticed it yet.

The Essayist 1, Blog With No Comments That Hasn't Even Acknowledged The Essayist's Link, 0.


UPDATE: Oh, now he's got it. Still no mention of me, though. Harrumph!

The English Language: Lady or Tramp?

Tenebris and I get into the slap-fight at Empty Mirrors.

This List Sucks.

There's no way that Gibson's Neuromancer is a better novel than Frank Herbert's Dune, which appears nowhere. I've read Neuromancer, and frankly, it's a big so-what. And no Heinlein? I can see Starship Troopers not making the cut, but Stranger in a Strange Land was damn fine, as was Glory Road.

But the real travesty is the presence of Tropic of Cancer, a drunken Parisian tour diary masquerading as a novel. The thing is incoherent, pretentious, and worst of all, boring. It's like the guy skimmed Notes from the Underground and said "What someone oughta do is take this, stretch it out a bit, and throw in some more lively street slang, like the word for a woman's genitals. Especially the word for a woman's generals that rhymes with 'bunt'."

Someone do please explain why anyone would read this monument to banality when they could achieve the same effect instantaneously by hitting themselves on the head with it. Remember, keep the mouth open, and say "Wa" at the moment of impact.

Greatest Songs: #16

Television: "Glory" (1978, from Adventure)

Jon Savage wrote in England's Dreaming that after Punk, "pop time became forever splintered, post-modern". What he means by that is that not only do the classics never go out of style, nothing ever does, not really. Deep within the shaggy fury of the Grunge 90's, for example, 80's New Wave was merely sleeping, waiting for its chance to revive blazers and treble. I have students who weren't even born in the 80's who get very offended and hurt when I say bad things about Journey. And why shouldn't they? Journey's still releasing CD's (of Greatest Hits) and DVD's of Concerts all the way to 1997. They haven't really gone anywhere, except from the Latest Edition of What's Cool Now!, which you could argue they were never really on.

The truth is, there are only four Styles of Rock: Mod, Rocker, Hippie, and Geek. Rocker is the oldest, and has a direct line of descent from Chuck Berry straight through to the Hives, in which it has deliberately changed hardly at all. Hippie is anything involving folk styles, acid dreams, and spiritual ponderings. Geek runs the gamut from the virtuoso noodlings of a Steve Vai or Jeff Beck to the almost religious fervor that bands like Rush, Weezer or the aforementioned Journey evokes from the nerd set.

Oh, shut up. I'm getting to the song.

These four styles can be freely used by bands or even scenes; the Jam Band movment, for example is equal parts Hippie and Geek. Punk was a lot of Rocker and a bit of Mod. New Wave was mostly Mod, with a touch of Geek. Metal is Rocker attitude, Geek stylings, and a lot of neo-Classical pretensions. Et cetera, et cetera, ad infinitum.

But what is Mod? Mod is Urban Rock, cool and detached, poetic and trebly, sharp and oddly sad. The Beatles were a Mod band before they turned Hippie, and even then they could never completely shake their Pop roots. The Who are the archetypal Mod band, who went down the Beatles path, then tried to be Rockers, and stopped being interesting a long time ago. Early Mod owed much to Rocker, and current Mod bands like Interpol and the Strokes owe a lot to Television.

"Glory" from their second album, is especially noteworthy as a forerunner of sounds to come. You can tell that the Strokes copied their guitar antics from Verlaine's and Lloyd's up-and-down, theme-and-variation routine. The rythmn section however, is not ignored, indeed, the soft funk of Fred Smith's bass and Billy Ficca's drums are propulsive and soothing throughout. The combination of these creates a joyful noise. It's pretty, the way Kind of Blue or Radiohead is pretty; it twinkles and grooves and smirks.

Tom Verlaine regarded himself as a poet, and wanted his lyrics to be a step forward in the movement of Rock Poetry. However, his voice reminds one of a tortured goat, so I've never paid much mind to his lyrics. I recall phrases like "lips so red" and "blah blah blah", but the real standout is the chorus:
When I
see the glory,
I don't
gotta worry.

Hardly genius, but it's got a certain touch to it; the longing for the eternal, the beautiful, the true, the 1/3 More FREE! That puts it outside the mostly self-involved subject matter of New Wave. For that, and for it's sweet tone, it makes the list.


#17

Tuesday, October 18, 2005

The Most Powerful Branch.

Go read UnbornChickenVoice. Matt has a fairly persuasive argument that Congress is the one calling the shots these days. In a nutshell, the President depends on states with Republican congressmen for re-election, and his lil' war in Iraq make him beholden to his party. I think it has as much to do with the Pres' spending spree on No Child Left Behind and Medicare as Iraq, but we all assign blame based on which oxen we prefer gored. I left him with the Great Unanswered Question, hopefully we'll see a response.

The, Um, Stones...

...have apparently released their greatest album since '81, maybe since '72. Have you heard? Bet you have. The meme's even struck Vodkapundit.

Maybe, contrary to this, I'll buy the thing after all. But then again, I might not. Too-high expectations might ruin the thing.

New song post tomorrow. Got to balance the checkbook.

Fear the News Cycle

Whatever the merits of the accusations of "voting irregularities" in the Iraqi referendum (which the Iraqis are themselves investigating), something else is coming along that will push it slightly to the side: Saddam's Trial. Omar at Iraq the Model, for example, is more interested in the latter.


UPDATE: Then again, we might get a continuance. For some reason, the court is inclined to grant one. Off the top of my head, that seems a really bad idea for several reasons:


  • Saddam's been in custody since December 2003. This is now October 2005. How much time does he need?

  • What purpose does it serve us to drag this thing out, like Milosevic's trial in the Hague? There's no way we're ever going to convince Ramsey Clark that this trial is just. We could wait until Elijah, Jesus, and Mohammed themselves came down and said "Guilty!" and the dictator-snuggling left would still say the whole court was illegitimate.

  • The longer it goes on, the longer the Butcher gets to present himself as "optimistic and confident of his innocence." I doubt not that Saddam will be as fierce in his defense as Hermann Goering was, and I doubt not that it will be great spectacle. But the whole purpose of this is to demonstrate to the world that this man, and men like him, are not invincible, and we ought to waste no time about getting that across.


  • Justice should be open, fair, and swift. Let's demonstrate our capacity to do that.

    "Limited Government is a Process, Not an Event"

    Qando has an interesting idea about getting Congress into budget-detox. And it doesn't involve a line-item veto, which, to my mind, puts too much power into the hands of the executive. The comments are full of thought as well.

    But who will bell the cat?

    This...

    ...is neat, if you're a history buff, especially one interested in pre-history.

    HA!

    The Meatriarchy gives an MST3K-level response to a headline that deserves it.

    Blogging Will Be Light...

    ...as I have much to do. I might check in later this afternoon, with a new Greatest Song or some other random creation.

    Monday, October 17, 2005

    Rape Up, Murder Down

    Clearly, we aren't murdering enough rapists.

    If You Can Dream It, We Can Tax It

    Professor Bainbridge looks at the President's tax reform panel, and doesn't find exactly the radical change I was hoping for. I want to see the tax code radically simplified, and to see entitlements moved away from the public purse, and a gradual lessening of things controlled by Washington. I'd also like to see my own take-home pay increase. I don't know if the President is going to accomplish any of these things, especially now that Social Security is dead in the water.

    If VAT replaces income tax for all but the wealthiest, that might be worth doing, but only if the Canadian method of public transparency is followed (Yes, I'm praising something Canadian). My father's been a big VAT fan for a while; he thinks it will shift the way people spend their money to better things. It might be so; it might not be; we'll need to see the proposal. I have a great fear that if tax reform is too modest, the Democrats will kill it, the way they killed the partial Social Security privatization, by the simple method of declaring an already-moderated legislation to be "too radical".

    We aren't going to be able to negotiate our way to this stuff. FDR didn't "negotiate" the New Deal, he proposed, the Democratic Congress obeyed (most of the time), and the Republicans spent 20 years out of the White House. When is the GOP gonna start acting like the majority party?

    Greatest Songs: #17

    The Reverend Horton Heat - "The Devil's Chasing Me" (1992, from The Full Custom Gospel Sounds of the Reverend Horton Heat)


    Pop genres are stupid. The difference between Muddy Waters and Franz Ferdinand is utterly minute, scarcely more than a nuance, yet they are treated as though one is watercolor and one is expressionist sculpture. And subgenres are even stupider. How anyone is supposed to tell the difference between hardcore, slo-core, grind-core, or death metal, and black metal, or electro and hip-hop, and talk about it intelligently for more than two minutes is beyond me. They're all marketing categories, and while they may be useful for communicating to consumers, they're meaningless in terms of evaluating artistic merit.

    For example, "the Devil's Chasing Me" by the Good Reverend H.H. Some call it Rockabilly, some call it Psychobilly. The latter name exists because people associate Rockabilly with the 50's, and the 50's are bad, mmmkay? Also, Psychobilly is low-fi, dark-imaged, and makes gleeful noise about unpleasant things, which is why Screamin' Jay Hawkins is Psychobilly. Except he's not.

    Right, the song, the song. Beautiful reverb guitar wash, great swingin' backbeat, and a tone that shifts from Robert Johnson horror-of-the-soul-on-the-lost-highway to winky-wink devil-in-velvet imagery. Most of the Reverend's tunes are about being delightfully naughty, a big heaping plateful of sex, drugs, and big fast cars burning a hole in your eardrum. This one isn't. It's about the cost for all that wild living, the sinking suspicion that no matter how much you stuff into yourself, it will never be enough, that you'll lose the taste for everything you thought you wanted, that no matter how fast you run from the devil, if you don't change yourself, you'll run right into his mouth.

    Do I contend that RHH had such in mind when he penned the song? No, but I don't contend otherwise, either. For all I know he heard Jimbo lay down a baseline, felt chills up his spine, and then listened to some old blues 78's to get ideas. It's such a well-worn groove that anyone could probably come up with something along those lines. But if Good Charlotte did it, it would be a parody, unintentional or not, and it would sound terrible. This one doesn't, because it has too much soul, which Good Charlotte confuses with volume.

    That's "soul" in the sense of bouncy groove and soul in the sense of rational principle of life, and soul in the sense of that which remains after death. This song has it, in spades. It may be a sorrowful, lamenting soul, that sounds like it won't ever escape what it's done to itself, but sometimes that's the only way to know a soul is there.


    #18

    Happy Monday

    I don't need the WaPo's "But many challenges remain..." analysis template to tell me what happened over the weekend. Nor do I agree with it: the assumption that the insurgency lives or dies based on Sunni participation in the new constitution is spurious, given the number of foreigners in Zarqawi's crews. And incidentally, several parts of the USA "massively rejected" our own Constitution when it was being voted on. Rhode Island didn't join until Washington was a year in office.

    No, all I need to know is this bit of info from Iran:

    The regime-run web site, BAZTAB, in a report admitted to the regime's political defeat in soliciting the support of the people of Iraq and the region where dozens of Arab-language media, backed by the regime, including Al Alam TV are being broadcast.

    Once again, if we haven't won completely yet, they haven't won at all.


    Plus, the GOP remembers what it was elected to do! Remind me to thank the guy who indicted DeLay.


    UPDATE: Walid Phares thinks the election is a massive victory:

    If we divide the number of US soldiers who died in the conflict till October 15, we'd realize that for each fallen hero, 4,500 Iraqi voters were given the right to vote against Terror. In the global conflict with Jihadism, U.S. efforts and sacrifices are triggering greater resources against the empire projected by Ayman Thawahiri and Usama Bin Laden.

    The most difficult times may still be ahead in this conflict waged by the Jihadists, but somewhere in the Middle East, some people have spoken against democracy's enemies: and that is one victory.

    Read the whole thing.

    Friday, October 14, 2005

    Greatest Songs: #18

    Beastie Boys - "And Me" (1998, from Hello Nasty)


    The great thing about the Beastie Boys, on their first five albums, anyway, is that they always shifted their sound. Having birthed rap-rock on Licenced To Ill, they begat the Sample Age on Paul's Boutique, became a real band with real instruments again on Check Your Head, and gave us the Buddha-Booty-Shaker with Ill Communications. Yet each one is definitively a Beastie Boys album, and a handful of tracks would be at home on any one of them.

    Hello Nasty, depending on who you ask, is either the Beastie's Exile on Main Street, or their Goat's Head Soup, either their peak or the beginning of the inevitable decline. Sometimes it's hard to tell the difference (isn't the peak, by definition, the start of going down?), and sometimes, it's harder to care. At any rate, their are several choice cuts here, and I've picked the one that did the best.

    Oh, but surely not. That two-note vamp? The reverbed vocals? The cartoony sound effects? Yes, yes, and yes. We've all heard the party-to-the-break-of-dawn club grooves, you know, "No Sleep Til Brooklyn" Parts 2, 4, 5, and 6. On To the Five Boroughs they filled a whole album with it. I love them as much as the next man, but they aren't the best things the B-Boys have done. This is.

    First of all, it's mellow. Thirdly, it's funky. Sixth and lastly, its lyrics express a simple idea with vast possibilities; the definition of poetry. And to conclude, it's all of these at once.

    The first is achieved by the aforementioned two-note vamp. The shifting beat and phased-in effects accomplish the third. The sixth depend on iterations of "Once again I'm all wrapped up in me," a commentary on the great human paradox: the more we focus on ourselves, the weaker and weaker we become. It is only when devoting the self, at least in part, to something held in higher value (truth, justice, freedome, country, God) that we tap into our potential. It's a good deal more persuasive than the Earth-mother rants they subjected us to on Ill Communications (remember, rhyming "commercial" with "commercial" is a sign of your PASSION, not of your STUNTED VOCABULARY).

    Like the best of their work, the song doesn't stay put, but constantly grows and gurgles and horns into a wonderful piece of fusion. And you know what? I DO wish I could be outside playing basketbal, in the reign, and not get wet. Wouldn't that be great?


    #19

    But I Liked Pierce Brosnan!

    Is it just me, or does the new Bond look like Sean Bien? How are we supposed to deal with a Bond who looks like the villain from GoldenEye?

    Ah, well. He can't be as bad as Timothy Dalton.

    Thursday, October 13, 2005

    New Link.

    My theft from De Toqueville Boulevard continues. Meet Samantha Burns:
    Canada: think of us as America's beer cooler.

    Ha!

    The Auld Argument

    De Tocqueville Boulevard has a good post about the back-and-forth between elitism and populism:
    Which gets me back to the central question- do we want an Average Joe, or the best and brighest? We go back and forth between the two, and the goalposts are always moving. When Thomas Frank asked What's The Matter With Kansas? he really missed the point- Kansas has always been a populist state. What constitutes populism changes- once it was free land and labor movements, now it's being pro-gun and anti-abortion.

    My comments about Hunter Thompson in the comments section are, of course, only my own.

    Z-Man Declines a Proffered ClueBat

    Iraq the Model gives us some detail about the disagreements current within the insurgency. Apparently Ayman "Bubba" Al-Zwahiri suggested to Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi that perhaps blowing up civilian Muslim Iraqis might be, oh, not cool with Islam.

    Well, Z-Man is having none of it. It seems he told Bubba that the Shi'ites are firstly heretics and secondarily collaborators, and it is just to slay them.

    Yeah, they're winning hearts and minds all over the country. We are so doomed.

    Greatest Songs #19

    The Rolling Stones - "Shattered" (1978, from Some Girls)

    It's fitting that the most punk of the Stones' tunes is the one with the most dominant bass line. In early punk, in the form of Pere Ubu, the Ramones, and the Clash, the bass carried the melody while the guitar(s) created a whirl of ringing noise. So it is with "Shattered", an apres-moi-le-deluge screed from what many consider the last Stones album of true artistic merit, and doubtless the one which encouraged Mick to copy Bowie's Young Americans soul-music phase, resulting in a slew of records for CBS that even stalward apologists loathe.

    But enough history. "Shattered" transcends its album, dribbling contempt on the rotting corpse of late-70's New York City ("Bite the Big Apple...don't mind the maggots," sneers Mick), the sycophants of the rock scene, and even the self, without sounding weary at all, merely weathered. I almost went with "Respectable" from the same album, but "Respectable," good as it is, sharp as it is, is too much of a kiss-off song to really approach the awareness of "Shattered." In '78 the Stones were being (justly, based on prior product) derided as dinosaurs, 60's leftovers. Some Girls was meant to be the rejoinder to such. But the last song on the album has the singer describing himself as torn up, run over, food for the mindless. Meanwhile, the rest of the band chimes in with the kind of tongue-in-cheek doo-wop ("Doop, Sha-dooby, Shattered, Shattered") the Beatles employed on "Revolution 1".

    It's a joke, but who's getting it? The honkies fleeing as the crime wave's goin' up, up, up, up, UP? The friends' comin' round to flatter, flatter, flatter? The Puerto Rican Girls who are just DYIN' to meetchoo? Methinks not. Methinks I hear the Stones hitting the end of their idea train, and just deciding to "Pile it up, pile it high on the platter," and keep serving it hot.

    Which, according to many, they've been doing. And we've been buying. And but few of the bands that have come since have done more, either.

    Can't say they didn't warn us.


    #20

    Scratch a Rebel, Find an Aristocrat

    Madonna says that TV is trash.

    Madonna.

    The woman who owes her entire career to TV (and trash) forbids it to her children. She even claims to be a strict disciplinarian, to the point of taking her kids clothes away if they leave them on the floor.

    To a degree, this is fantastically un-surprising, yet I wonder what the bullet-breasted Blond Ambition era Madonna would say to her bourgeois future self. I also wonder if she gives much serious consideration to how TV became such trash.


    UPDATE: Catholic Light chimes in with new stuff, Madonna ranting about hell and wickedness. The comment gags are nicely contemptuous. Is that a shark underneath us?

    Working...

    Blogging won't happen until my classes get out, around 1 pm. I'll have a new Greatest Song and will be playing with my trackback toys. I mean to stay a Flippery Fish.

    Wednesday, October 12, 2005

    The Other Side

    Things may look bad for the Republicans, but don't rush to the situation that "things" will necessarily reward the Democrats. Vodkapundit linked to this Howard Fineman article on some of the donkey's blues. It's pre-Miers, but some of the problems are structural and philosophical. However poorly the Republican party has served as a vehicle for conservative ideas, those ideas are now a great deal more in the mainstream than formerly, and Democrats haven't adjusted their ideas accordingly.

    I suspect the Democrats are now going through what the Republicans when through from the Goldwater-to-Reagan years: years in the wilderness philosophically, with nothing but furious opposition to offer voters. They haven't decided what they're going to be about. I submit that a Democrat who ran on fiscal restraint and a vigorous war on Islamic terrorism would win significant crossover votes, and might not alienate his own party too much if he/she could put in some good rhetoric against "theocrats" or, better yet, be a minority (Watch Bill Richardson).

    But lacking that, I think it's time we had a third party, one that took something from both and offered a comprehensive package. I don't mean splitting the difference, mind you, I mean taking some good Republican ideas (Fixing Social Security, simplifying the tax code, sticking it to terrorists and their helpers abroad no matter how loud the international bureaucracy cries about it), and some good Democratic ideas (someone fill this in for me), and made a path around the culture-war trenches we've been slogging through.

    Any takers?


    UPDATE: Instapundit has this Michael Barone take on a similar theme. Like Fineman, he uses Democratic, not Republican sources. He also uses the phrase "de-nationalized elites" which I find very interesting indeed.


    AND FURTHERMORE: Boxing Alcibiades offers a similar take, saying that Miers won't matter much by the time November '06 rolls around, and that the Democrats still haven't lost enough Mooreonity to appeal to enough of the center to win. Could be.

    Greatest Songs: #20

    Pursuant to Yesterday's entry, Here's the first song on my list of the 20 greatest from my lifetime and my collection:

    The Exploited - "Race Against Time" (1984) (From Don't Forget the Chaos)

    Mid-80's offering from one of several loud, laddish mohawk bands of that era, most of which I've never bothered with. The Exploited, best known for squeezing a whole song out of three words ("Sex and Violence"), squeezed a ferocious, nightmareish groove onto this particular track, rendering it heavy and fast without descending into the unlistenably distorted, brutal wankery for which so many hardcore bands are justly derided. It's the perfect kind of song to get you going in the morning when you'd really rather not, and to keep you awake when you're zipping up the NJ Turnpike at 9 pm on a Friday, trying to make the city before the evening is all gone.


    Some might complain that you can't understand the lyrics, which is true, but which is also irrelevant. I'm not going to pick songs for a deftly-rendered bon mot snuck in at the end of a stanza. 90% of pop lyrics are banal, 5% are unintelligible, and 4% are so esoteric as to contain no meaning worth exploring. Sure that remaining 1% are great, but to me, they're an occasional bonus, not a criterion. So Wattie's shouting about some Race Against Time, and lacks the consonants to make anything else clearer. So what? The song itself is racing, letting up only at its abrupt end. Racing in the song, racing in the lyrics. What else do you need?

    Religious Ignorance is Blistering

    I'm Catholic, but I've made it a habit not to castigate those who have honest disagreements with my faith ('course, some people's definition of "castigate" may be different from mine. Hey ho...). Someone who doesn't believe in God can't be expected to buy into the Doctrine, and obey it (I barely manage such). But what repeatedly irritates me is when I'm told that my religion believes things that it doesn't believe, or did things that it didn't do.

    Example: the Church "sold out" the Jews during the Holocaust. One could just as easily say that the Democratic Party "sold out" the Jews during the Holocaust, if the failure to prioritize its end above all things is the sole criterion for "selling out." All the evidence against Pius Twelve is circumstantial and speculative, and ignores the evidence that he was the only man in Nazi-dominate Europe to condemn the Nazis, and that he saved as many Jews as he could. None of this information is new, but people prefer to ignore it. It's too useful a cudgel to abandon.

    Then there's the Galileo routine. The same people that buy this melodrama think no one thought the world was round before Columbus, and I suspect then to be near cousins of whoever it is that taught so many of this year's freshmen that A.D. stands for "After Death."

    But the most recent smack-yourself-on-the-head display was the declaration, by the Times of London, that the Catholic Church no longer believes in the Bible, because it pointed out that not all passages in Scripture are to be taken as literal, scientific, or historical truth. Which the Church has been saying for decades, but never mind. We have a "Saved" script to peddle: if you think Jesus is the Savior of the world, you hate evolution. 'Natch.

    Catholic Light has the details (and a link to anyone curious about the Galileo routine).

    Minor Detail.

    I've switched to using HaloScan for comments and Trackbacking. Why? Because it's popular, and I'm all about popular. Doot-doot-doot-Doo!

    Tuesday, October 11, 2005

    The Best Argument for "Staying Home" in '06 I've Yet Seen...

    Boxing Alcibiades on the Miers pick, and the Republican base:

    It seems very much like the Republicans’ “trouble with the base” is being, once again, healed through the sovereign expedient of ignoring that base completely and trying to spend his way back to high approval numbers. Well, guess what? Republicans can't do that. That's what Democrats do.

    If the GOP doesn't take back some fiscal conservatism, the mid-term elections don't look good. Of course, it's still a year away, and anything can happen, and a Miers-Money Meltdown already could be at work, but still...

    Music Wars and Dead White Men

    I thought I'd let my 5 loyal readers know what's on my mind for the rest of this week:


    Matt over at UnbornChickenVoice has started compiling a list of the 20 Greatest Songs of his lifetime, which coincides with mine, as we were both born in the same year. Matt has always been way the hell ahead of me in terms of music fandom; he had a vast library when I had literally no knowledge of popular music of any kind. Many of the things I loudly claimed to hate when we knew each other in college I have since grown to appreciate. Even now, I guaruntee that he'll pull out a list of 20 songs that I've never heard of.

    Naturally, I will view this as a challenge and respond accordingly.

    Starting tommorrow, you can expect to see the 20 Greatest Songs Of My Lifetime Currently In My Music Collection. It's going to be a weaker list than Matt's, but you just might get the thrill of recognition.


    I'm also thinking about revisionism, per Glenn Reynold's noting of this book as a tonic to the by-now-expected yearly flagellation regarding Columbus Day. Being on the side of the political aisle I am, I tend to view revisionists as but part of the lefties' front organization. I think sometime this week or next, I'll get a real essay on the subject out.

    Monday, October 10, 2005

    Where are You Going, Redux.

    It seems to me that, all claims to the contrary, this naked-power grab is not just about domain names and traffic-management. Free speech on the 'net is at stake, too.

    The U.N. has created nothing, offered nothing, given nothing, saved nothing. It is a hindrance to free men and women masquerading as the New Order. We should continue to tell them to get stuffed.

    And isn't this excquisitely timed?

    Thursday, October 06, 2005

    Where are You Going?

    I remember a running gag in college about the Chinese and they're naval plans, specifically, that they were building a "blue-water" or "deep-water" or at any rate, high-seas fleet. The line went something like this: "When a nation that's never had a blue-water navy starts building a blue-water navy, the logical question is, 'Where are you going?"

    This is what I thought of when I read about the coming hostile takeover of the Internet.

    There's a perfectly good reason why the U.S. Government should be allowed to continue in "control" of the internet indefinitely, and I'm not saying that because I'm an American. I happen to be one of those Americans who doesn't think the U.S. Government should have control over anything besides highway construction and blowing things up. On everything else, their hand is is the oily taint of death. But I say, Uncle Sam should continue to "control" the internet, because as long as it has done so, it hasn't controlled the Internet at all.

    But is it really "fair" for one nation's government to control something that the whole world uses? Well, when that government a) invented the something, b) freely distributed the something at its own expense, c) derives no revenue or profit from the something, and d) permits all to use the something as they see fit, then, well, yes.

    I can understand people who don't trust the U.S. Government objecting to this. But I don't trust the EU or the UN. Nor do I understand their motives. What could possibly be wrong with the Internet that it needs to be handed over to a bureaucracy that has a past history of obsessive top-down micro-management? I wasn't aware that there was anything wrong with the way the Internet currently works. Absent that, we are left with the question "Where are you going?" to which answers are easy to imagine.

    Tuesday, October 04, 2005

    The Unbearable Sadness of Political Correctness

    I know this is stupid. You know this is stupid. Leno and Letterman and SNL could clean up with jokes about how stupid this is. What's going to be done about it? Not a fucking thing.

    Are we ready to admit yet that "cultural sensitivity" means "rule by hypersensitive assholes"?

    Further Proof of Patrick's Law

    Apparently Friedrich Hayek, the Prime Mover of Libertarianism, favored state subsidies for the Vienna State Opera.

    Somewhere, Ayn Rand is laughing.

    Monday, October 03, 2005

    Let 'Em Talk

    When first I heard about George Bush appointing a woman who's never been a judge to the Supreme Court, It was a "WTF, over?" moment. Then a couple of facts were pointed out in the previous link:

      Rehnquist and nineteen other supreme court justices had never served as judges before serving on the High Court.

      Bush has a high opinion of her lawyerly verbal fencing skills: "He also joked of Miers, 'When it comes to a cross-examination, she can fillet better than Mrs. Paul.'"

    The former is likely to become a major Republican talking point. But the latter is more interesting, in light of the Roberts appointment. Bill Buckley wrote after the Bork rejection that Supreme Court nominees who make an attempt to demonstrate their intellectual skills are rejected, while those who give the impression, like Souter, of having no mind, are accepted. John Roberts managed to turn that on his ear by letting the Senators who questioned him make asses of themselves, then respond with carefully measured briefs.

    While it's easy to joke about how impressive someone's verbal skills need to be to impress Bush, the President may have learned the trick to getting his kind of people on the high court: get someone who can play the Senators and give them nowhere to go. Whether this means she should actually be on the Supreme Court, I don't know.