Wednesday, October 06, 2004

"The time has come," the Walrus said, "To talk of other things...

Or, Thank y'all for coming, God Bless you, good night...



A few months ago I decided to keep this site going, because I had a remaining few hopes for it. Some of those hopes have worked out (readership is mostly up, I've gained a rank in the Ecosystem), but I'm not satisfied with the site regardless, and I'm not satisfied with the amount of work it's taking to maintain. The pressure of daily blogging is conflicting with work, and I'm not even blogging often enough to bring enough readers to justify it. Too much time and not enough satisfaction is the bottom line.


So, I'm done. This will be my last post. I have the embryo of another site in mind, one more suited to my hopes, but I need a few months off to ponder and get some other things done.

This may seem abrupt, but abrupt has virtues, and it's these I hope to make use of. To those that have read me, even when I wasn't throwing anything up, thanks. To those brave few that have linked me, thanks. I'll leave the site up as is, as an archive, and when I start the new site I'm going to link most of the folks that I've linked already.


Have a pleasant and happy day, and I'll see you when I see you.

Tuesday, October 05, 2004

Lining up with the Zeitgeist

Or, Damn You, Lucas! DAMN YOU!




When the Star Wars Prequels were first released, I would hear negativity from no man (no, nor woman neither, though by your smiling you seem to say so) about the film's shortcomings. It was Star Wars, dash it all: it had the look, blasters, lightsabers, exotic animals, races, the Force, Yoda, all the elements. All the naysayers were obviously self-absorbed pseudo-intellectuals who couldn't stand the concept of a film becoming popular without the approval of the critics. The nagging doubts within my head took years and another mediocre prequel to release.


But, like I keep saying to the faux-nihilists who fondle themselves while watching Empire Strikes Back and whine about Return of the Jedi, it ain't all bad. As a matter of fact, there are a handful of SW-quality scenes in the prequels. To wit:


1) Underwater Passage to Theed. "There is always a bigger fish," is a great line, and it leads to a nice fun escape for the good guys marred only by the annoying robot with the "To Coruscant...that doesn't compute...Oh, yeah, your under arrest" schtick.


2) Darth Maul vs. Qui-Gon and Obi-Wan. Good duel, good backing music, good death. As a matter of fact, any seen with Qui and Obi and lightsabers breathed life into the whole sordid business. The whole last half-hour was undone only by Jar-Jar and young Anakin's unfunny antics.


3) The Incredible Exploding Intro. It was a bit of a surprise that Lucas would choose to literally toss a bomb into what was otherwise a sedately normal space-to-land opening scene. Coming as Attack of the Clones did so soon after 9/11, I literally felt my guts twist. Too bad the intensity wasn't maintained.


4) Coruscant by Rush Hour. Admittedley, this sequence went on about a hair too long. But it still had some nice twists and turns and three-dimensional traffic-pattern action.


5) Obi-Wan and the Skinny People. Say what you will about Lucas, the guy knows how to put great shots together. A whole waterworld populated by ultramodern gray creatures who look like the offspring of Whitley Schreiber's aliens and Elastic Man. Obi-Wan's fight with Jango Fett is the only thing that keeps the early film from boring the audience to death with Anakin/Amidala "love" scenes that have all the smoldering passion of an elderly person with gout.


6) Don't Go Back to Tatooine. Finally, the family relation between the Lars and the Skywalkers is explained. Plus, Anakin kills sandpeople, which is something I've been wanting to see happen for a long time, and Shmi has a damn fine death rattle. The scene where Anakin confesses to his butchery almost doesn't suck either. Almost.


7) Obi-Wan's Retort to his now-captured Apprentice explaining that he'd come to rescue them. Just to underline the fact that as much as we may dislike the prequels, they'd be a thousand times worse were not Ewan McGregor gamely attempting to carry them on his shoulders. He's the only actor I've seen with a solid take on his part (in fairness, his is one of a few characters that are in all six movies, but Vader is a limited resource for portraying a before-the-fall Anakin, and Yoda is only voiced by a human, and Palpatine only has to pull his proverbial moustache).




There are other spots of non-suckage that time will not permit me to explore, but the point is that they are but blips in a vast sea of banal writing and utterly absent directing. Lucas' remaining skill is, as I said, creating great shots; his narrative skills have slipped and his dialogue, creaky at best, has become with a few exceptions howlingly bad.


And his actors get no support in working this material; even Samuel L. Jackson seems neutered by the things he has to say. Anakin Skywalker is supposed to be the main character in these movies, and it appears that Lucas has hardly given any thought to how they're supposed to be portrayed. Consequently, his Anakins range from borderline believable through insipid to downright annoying. And Lucas has managed a feat that, prior to 1999, no red-blooded American male would have thought possible: making Natalie Portman seem boring.




All of the above would be forgivable if Lucas hadn't decided to suck retroactively. Hell, most artist go through periods of mediocrity and drought, and sometimes those droughts are terminal: look what happened to that whiny turd Brando. But Lucas isn't content with tainting our memories, oh no: he's decided to erase them. And the method he's using is the DVD release of the original trilogy.


You see, it's the Special Edition, in which Lucas changes scenes to suit him, such as making Greedo shoot first. But more, it's the Special Special Edition, which brings the prequels into the originals, most notably by adding the hated Gungans to the galaxy-wide celebration at the end of ROTJ, and replacing ROTJ's Anakin, Sebastian Shaw, with the prequels Anakin, pretty-boy Hayden Christianson, in a move with calculations no doubt similar to bringing in N'Sync to play Jedi in AOTC.


Which means that there's no Letterbox way of watching Star Wars as we originally saw it. Which means I'll have to hang on to my VCR to watch the last THX version on VHS. Which means that, as much as I dislike to have to say it, that Lucas is on my list.

Monday, October 04, 2004

Clear...as mud





I used to really enjoy Jon Stewart, and get a real kick out of the Daily Show and its mockery of the media's sensationalism and garbage. Stewart makes a better Daily Show host than Craig Kilborn ever was: nebbishy and self-mocking where Kilborn was snide and above-it-all (not that being snide and above-it-all wasn't funny. But Stewart's funny is far more welcoming). And most of the time Stewart, though an out-and-out Democrat, wasn't so doctrinaire as to ignore the insanity coming from his side of the aisle. I recall just before the start of the Iraq War, Stewart made a point of mocking the conspiracy hippies who opposed the war.


I haven't watched the show once since the spring, but I haven't watched much of any TV since the spring, since I don't have TV (culture rebel am I). But when the opportunity to watch TDS has arisen, I've made a determined effort to avoid it. The politics is wearing on the funny. Mostly this is because sharing a joke requires a shared sense of what is absurd, and Jon and I don't necessarily share that anymore. I can appreciate his technique but still find the end product annoying instead of amusing.


The post-debate commentary I caught at my folks' house over the weekend provides the clearest example. They showed the clip of Kerry saying something to the effect of:


I have always said that Saddam was a threat, and that there was a right way and a wrong way to disarm him. This President chose the wrong way.


To which Steward commented:

Blah-de-blah, there he goes again...wait a minute, that was pretty clear.


And I was left with this warm explosion of "NO IT WASN'T!" inside my head.


Kerry's statement gives us no details as to a) why the President's way is the "wrong way." or b) what the "right way" is, and why it's the "right way." Yet the media fawns all over his performance, as shaking off the "flip-flopper" vibe. But the statement and much of what else he said in the debate was vintage Kerry: trying to be on all sides of the issue. He sounds like he's for war in principle, and he sounds like he's against this particular war, or how it was waged, or how it was declared, or something, and he sounds like he's making a clear statement when he's doing nothing of the kind.


And this is why I avoid debates. They're not just boring, they're empty: two guys trying to put on the show of being presidential without actually revealing anything that might actually change anybody's mind. Kerry has no policy on Iraq, other than Bush did it wrong, and he'll do better because he'll be nicer to the world. And to listen to Bush, you'd be hard pressed to know what he's doing in Iraq, other than not running away.


We know why this is: television is awful at conveying anything other than the immediate. It's a phony alternate to reality. The debates don't gauge anything but which guy acts most presidential when the cameras are on, when 90% of what the POTUS does is off-camera: policy meetings, intelligence briefings, signing executive orders, etc. I want to have the guy who knows what he's doing when its time to push legislation through or make a decision and stick with it. Bush's legislative and foreign policy record have demonstrated to me that he knows how to do that. Nothing Kerry has done (done, not said) has indicated the same.


But his mush is treated as gold, and this gets ignored.